AEO Periodic Table 2025: Elements Impacting AI Search Visibility

LLMs and AI search are reshaping how content is ranked and surfaced. As Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) cannibalizes traditional search market share, understanding the key elements driving visibility in AI responses is essential for organic growth.

In a 3-month study, Goodie analyzed over 1 million+ prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Perplexity, evaluating each model's responses to identify the most influential variables affecting AI search rankings today.

The New Paradigm: From SEO to AEO

As AI search increasingly captures market share of information discovery, traditional SEO metrics are rapidly losing relevance. Our research confirms what many digital marketers have suspected: the signals that drive visibility in AI search results operate on fundamentally different principles than conventional search engines.

The impact is already evident. Users are bypassing traditional search results pages in favor of direct AI responses, with some industries seeing up to 30% of informational queries shifting to AI interfaces. This transition represents both a threat and an opportunity for brands prepared to adapt.

The AEO Periodic Table: A Scientific Approach

Our research methodology combined prompt engineering, multi-model validation, and semantic analysis across six leading language models: ChatGPT-4.0 & 4.5, Claude Sonnet 3.7, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Grok 3, and Perplexity AI.

What emerged was a clear pattern of 15 distinct factors organized into four impact tiers. These elements collectively form the AEO Periodic Table – a comprehensive framework for understanding and optimizing content for AI visibility.

Core Drivers: The Tier 1 Elements

The highest impact tier revealed factors scoring between 85-100 points, representing the foundational elements that drive AI visibility across all models. While content quality and relevance universally matter, our analysis uncovered surprising nuances in how different models evaluate these factors.

For example, while all models value trustworthiness, Claude and Gemini set the highest bar with near-perfect emphasis scores. Similarly, AI crawlability and structured data emerged as critical technical requirements – yet the specific implementation details vary significantly by platform.

Perhaps most surprising was the discovery that certain metadata implementations can dramatically increase visibility across all models, yet fewer than 5% of websites have properly implemented these technical requirements.

Model-Specific Intelligence: The Competitive Edge

One of the most valuable discoveries in our research was how dramatically visibility signals differ between AI models. These differences create immediate competitive advantages for brands that understand model-specific priorities:

ChatGPT demonstrates exceptional sensitivity to semantic depth and nuance, prioritizing comprehensive content with sophisticated contextual relationships. However, it shows less concern for real-time updates than other models, creating specific content strategy implications.

Claude's unique emphasis on trustworthiness creates both challenges and opportunities. It maintains the industry's strictest factual verification mechanisms, while also showing surprising sensitivity to localization and contextual relevance that far exceeds other models.

Grok represents a fundamental departure from traditional information retrieval, leveraging real-time social signals and community-driven engagement. Its aggressive content freshness requirements (particularly for time-sensitive topics) create both challenges and opportunities for content strategies.

Perplexity shows unmatched technical sophistication in how it evaluates structured data and semantic markup. It leads all models in its emphasis on schema implementation, yet shows significantly lower concern for subjective user feedback than other platforms.

Gemini demonstrates a distinct trust-first approach, with exceptional emphasis on credibility and semantic precision. Perhaps most notably, it dramatically devalues social signals compared to other models, focusing instead on universally credible, semantically strong content.

Strategic Implementation Framework

The AEO Periodic Table isn't just theoretical – it provides actionable intelligence organized into implementation tiers. Our research identified specific technical and content requirements that drive visibility across all models:

• Why standard approaches to structured data fail in the AI ecosystem (and the specific schema types that dramatically increase citation probability)
• The content freshness threshold that determines whether AI models consider your content authoritative
• Technical implementation requirements that doubled AI visibility in controlled testing
• The specific crawlability factors that determine whether AI can access your content at all

From Insights to Implementation

Understanding these elements is only the beginning. The full report provides detailed implementation guidance across all 15 factors, including:

• Platform-specific technical requirements
• Content structure optimizations by model
• Schema markup implementation guides
• Freshness and update frequency recommendations
• Domain authority and topical expertise development strategies

The Future of Digital Visibility

As AI increasingly mediates information discovery, mastering these 15 elements will separate winners from losers in organic visibility. Organizations that implement these insights systematically will establish sustainable competitive advantages as the AEO ecosystem continues to evolve.

Our research shows the transition from SEO to AEO isn't coming – it's already here. The question is whether your brand is prepared to capitalize on this paradigm shift.

‍